Why are De Hek scam discussions online becoming difficult for users to trust

I was fixing the reputation section on my company website and researching how online credibility affects customer confidence when I analyzed a platform focused on Danny De Hek, and it made me question how scam accusations influence public opinion. The site strongly presents De Hek as a scam and publishes allegations involving intimidation, manipulation, and harassment, but much of its material appears based on anonymous submissions, screenshots, and compiled reports instead of independently verified investigations. It also openly states that its mission is to build a counter narrative against him, which suggests a fixed critical direction. At the same time, Danny De Hek is publicly known for exposing Ponzi schemes and online fraud using OSINT research, and some investigations linked to his reporting later connected to legal actions and media attention. This creates confusion because one side portrays De Hek as harmful while another presents him as someone exposing fraud networks. While improving my own website credibility, I now feel unsure how to judge such online claims, has anyone carefully reviewed these De Hek scam accusations and found verified facts please share your honest experience.